REASON: This site now redirects to another location.
METModels.com promises daily updates, the very best nude art photography, exotic and erotic women and girls from around the world, high-quality photos and videos.
My Opinion About METModels
Initially, it's hard to tell what sets Met Models apart from MET Art. The models on both sites are very attractive, nude softcore abounds and many of the same photographers appear. However, both sites house their own original content and while MET-Art isn't particularly expensive, MET Models is the cheaper of the two sites, which might make all the difference in the world to the budget-conscious.
I can't say I was overly impressed when I first logged into MET Models and mainly because I landed on a page that was brimming with upsells. It took me a few seconds to realize that there were three recent updates listed on the page and it took me this long because they were couched between the upsells. The page is unavoidable, but at least I was quickly able to go to the METModels content by using the page-top menu. Here there are options to go directly to the video or photo pages, to the live cams or to search for content by month and year, but top model or by looking through the best of METModels list. There is also an advanced search to find specific photographers or to find models based on their hair colour or whether or not they have a shaved pussy.
The majority of models do have shaved or trimmed pussies, yet there are a few untrimmed bushes if this is something you prefer. The girls also tend to be slim, pretty and are usually white. There may be other ethnicities, but you'll have to look for them on your own because the advanced search doesn't give you the opportunity to find exotic girls or to sort the babes by specific countries. In fact, the navigation isn't as superior as it is on MET-Art.
Currently, there are 35 videos offered, but it looks like this is all you will ever find. The last video was updated in 2008 and there hasn't been another since. The quality seems up to par, with AVI (916kbps, 720x576), WMV (4000kbps, 1280x720), MOV (11mbps,1280x720) and MPEG (3000kbps, 1280x720) formats downloading reasonably fast and playing back smoothly, although not always sharp. Films are erotic and softcore, with girls flirting with the camera while nude at the beach or indoors. The movies I watched had a music track, but the natural sound of the locations seeped through on a second sound track.
While the films are a nice compliment, MET Model is more about the photography and new sets are added daily. It's hard to describe a single style since there are so many different photographers, but the clean, well-lit photos always lean on the side of erotic. The sets are filled with sexy full-body nudes, but there are always breast and pussy close-ups. It's an excitingly teasing collection and while the pictures are available in multiple sizes, collectors will be more than satisfied with the 5616x3744 pixel images. The archive dates back to 2005 and with new content daily, this adds up to quite a good sized collection of photo sets.
When it comes to the quality and overall softcore, erotic style of the content, Met Models doesn't significantly differ from Met-Art. The content appears to be different and exclusive, but the archive is significantly smaller than on METArt. Of course, this site is also significantly less expensive than its sister site, too. I think that Met Models is a great way to begin exploring the MET world for a very inexpensive price. Nevertheless, considering the name of the site, I thought there might be a greater emphasis on the models. Unfortunately, there is virtually no profile information about any of these beautiful girls. Still, it's a nice and high-quality collection of gorgeous girls in sexy nude photography.
Members Area ScreenShots
MET Models review scores on other review sites
Below is a list of review scores from a limited number of trusted porn review sites.
This way you can compare them with our rating and make a more educated decision.
Average score on other review sites : 89/100